Medicine and Health Care

Free-Market Health Care

Anarcho-Medicine: Seeking Alternatives to State-Endorsed Medical Care
by Karen De Coster
An interview with holistic physician Dr. Michael Janson.

Black Market Medicine: An Ethical Alternative to State Control
by Dr. Louis Alphonse Crespo

The Economics of Medical Care
by George Yossif, M.D.
"In voluntary markets, private medicine included, the key knowledge necessary for trade is conveyed by freely fluctuating prices. The price system conveys knowledge of the personal and subjective utilities of the actors, that is, of the supply and demand of various commodities and services, which cannot be compared otherwise. Demand for ordinary medical care in voluntary markets is highly elastic and medical care by physicians is largely optional, except for some categories of life-threatening conditions, few in number and low in incidence, sometimes known as “catastrophic illness.” As history shows, medical care in essentially voluntary markets tends to be accessible and affordable. Sustained price inflation in medical care is always a result of direct or indirect political intervention. The lately much-touted competition between providers is not the genuine competitive bidding for the satisfaction of the actual consumer of care, the patient, as a free market would have it. On the contrary, this politically created competition will further enhance and centralize the bureaucratic controls on medical care, thus compounding, instead of reducing, the inflationary effects of the multiple and pervasive political interventions already in operation."

The Economics of Medical Malpractice
May 30, 2006
by Russ Roberts and Alex Tabarrok
"Russ Roberts and Alex Tabarrok of George Mason University talk about medical malpractice, why insurance premiums vary by state, price gouging by insurance companies, the politics of being a judge and an idea for a new TV show using a tried-and-true formula: American Victim."

For-Profit Medicine and the Compassion Motive
by Tom G. Palmer
"Profits earned in the context of well-defined and enforced legal rights (as distinguished from the profits that accrue to being a brilliant thief) may provide the foundation not of coldness, but of compassion. The search for profit requires that the doctor consider the interests of the patient by putting himself or herself into the patient’s position, to imagine the suffering of others, to have compassion. In a free-market economy, the profit motive may be but another name for the compassion motive."

A Four-Step Health-Care Solution
by Hans-Hermann Hoppe
"To cure the problem requires not different or more government regulations and bureaucracies, as self-serving politicians want us to believe, but the elimination of all existing government controls."

Freedom works: Health
November 3, 2007
by Mark Landsbaum
"When people are responsible for the cost of their unhealthy lifestyles, they're more likely to avoid doing what brings on costly consequences. But when others assume the cost, people are inclined to engage in riskier behavior. Consequently, many take better care of their cars than their health."

A Free Market in Human Organs
by Robert Burrage

Free-Market Medicine
August 2002
by Larry Van Heerden
"The health-care market has failed to produce high-quality, low-cost medicine for two reasons: Consumers are insulated from the cost of medical care by third-party payers, and information on the performance of competing physicians is not available. Fixing the incentives and providing consumers with physician performance data will cause unnecessary surgery to decline, physician performance to improve, disease prevention to increase, and health-care efficiency to rise."

Free Market Medicine
by James W. Brook
"I am actually a part of a small, but growing, movement of doctors who have "opted out" of the third-party payment system and simply charge patients directly. No insurance contracts, no medicare, no medicaid, just direct payment at the time of service, from the person who receives the service."

Health Care
by Dr. Mary Ruwart
The good doctor answers tough questions about health care in a free society.

Healthcare Without Government
by Joe Peacott

Healthy Competition: What’s Holding Back Health Care and How to Free It by Michael F. Cannon and Michael D. Tanner
reviewed by Robert L. Ohsfeldt
"a concise and highly readable summary of the evidence refuting the case against market competition in health care."

Holding Health Care Accountable: Law and the New Medical Marketplace by E. Haavi Morreim
reviewed by Richard A. Epstein
"In my view, it is a mistake to treat liability for medical mishaps as though it were a subject of tort law—that is, as a subject for direct judicial or legislative regulation. All the parties to the health care relationship stand in some consensual arrangement with each other, either through direct contact or through intermediates. The only way that incidents such as the bone marrow transplant misadventure will be avoided is for courts and legislatures to respect and to enforce all contracts among all players in the health care systems, subject only to the standard contractual defenses of duress, fraud, and incompetence, which should not be expanded for this occasion."

How the Free Market Would Handle Quarantines
7/16/2007
by Robert P. Murphy
"If the government relinquished its role in handling contagious diseases, the public would be far safer."

If the “Business Model” of Medicine Is Sick, What’s the Diagnosis, and What’s the Cure?
by Robert L. Ohsfeldt
"James P. Whalen is not alone in claiming that the business model of medicine has made the U.S. health-care system too expensive, inaccessible, inequitable, and mediocre. His misdiagnosis of what ails American health care, however, leads him to prescribe less of what the system needs to improve: real competition."

Independent Healthcare: Further Reflections of a Private Doctor
by Dr Robert Lefever
"I suggest that we should re-examine the ideas of our State Health and Welfare Systems—and incidentally, also our existing private medical system which is largely parasitic upon the State system—and start again with clear ideas of what we are trying to achieve and of how it can be done. We should begin by adopting the prime principle of Capitalism: paying for quality."

New Legal Organ Market
by David Undis
"LifeSharers is a non-profit voluntary network of organ and tissue donors. Membership is free, and anybody can join at www.lifesharers.com. Members agree to donate their organs and tissue when they die, but only to fellow LifeSharers members (unless no member is a suitable match). LifeSharers members say, in effect, “You can have first dibs on my organs, but only if you agree to donate yours.” By directing their donations in this way, LifeSharers members create a pool of organs that are potentially available only to fellow members."

On a resort island, volunteerism makes a difference.
by Deborah Greensway
Retired physicians in Hilton Head, SC, give their time to help residents with little or no health insurance.

Private is Better Than Public
by David G. Green
"It is in this sense of de-politicisation that privatisation is a good thing in itself. It allows the objectives of producers of goods and services to be self-chosen not politically-chosen."

The Right [that is, the only rational) Way to "Run" a Medical System
by Jan Narveson
"The correct thing to do with the Canadian, or any other top-down medical "system" is to junk it."

Saying Yes: In Defense of Drug Use by Jacob Sullum
reviewed by Richard Glen Boire
"It is difficult to imagine an open-minded person reading Sullum’s book and coming away from it without a much more informed understanding of why so many intelligent people choose to use illegal drugs."

Self-Medicating in Burma
by Kerry Howley
"Freedoms are in short supply in Burma, a country run by a hardened military, yet the freedom to treat a bout of food poisoning with pharmaceuticals was new to me. The United States is the only country in the world that divides drugs into two rigid categories of prescription-only and over-the-counter. Most other developed nations allow for a third class of drugs to be dispensed by a pharmacist, and developing nations typically do not have prescription requirements or fail to enforce them."

The Rise of Markets and the Fall of Infectious Disease
by Stephen Gold
"True, capitalism is not a magic wand. As the former Communist countries of Europe are learning, an affluent market economy takes time to develop. Still, if the lesser developed countries of the world can liberate their economies from government control and encourage private enterprise, then future generations of children there will look upon infectious diseases like typhus, cholera, and tuberculosis the way I looked upon scarlet fever—as a relic of bygone, pre-market days."

A Sales Pitch for Laissez-Faire Health Care
by Daniel B. Klein
"What would it mean to establish liberty of property, consent, and contract in the area of health care?"

Coercive Health Care

Drug Pushing

The Therapeutic State: The Tyranny of Pharmacracy
by Thomas S. Szasz
"Joining the traditional rationalizations for state coercion—“God’s will,” “the consent of the governed,” and “social justice”—comes a fourth: “coercion as treatment.” Unlike theocracy, democracy , and socialism, however, pharmacracy has met little opposition."

The Immorality of Socialized Health Care

Do No Harm
by Jane M. Orient, M.D.
"If government forces us all into a bureaucratically managed system, we will still have something called “health care,” delivered by persons called “health care providers.” But such a system will have no place for ethical physicians, whose Oath forbids them to accept a situation of conflict of interest with their patients."

The Healthcare “Crisis” in the USA: An Individualist Anarchist Critique
by Joe Peacott

Heil Health
by Pierre Lemieux
"More than an epithet hurled by defensive couch potatoes, “health Nazi” is a term well grounded in history, as science historian Robert Proctor illustrates in his remarkable book, The Nazi War On Cancer. Although Proctor is correct to note that public health doesn’t imply Nazism, he fails to see that draconian public health laws require a state apparatus strong enough to crush us."

The Immorality of Government-Mandated Health Care
by Paul A. Cleveland
"National health-care insurance, or its mandated provision, is unjust. It is nothing more than a forced charity, which is no charity at all. In this vein we might flatter ourselves into believing that we are doing good works, but it simply is not true. True mercy is extended as a matter of voluntary choice. It is not forced. Government mandates which require some to provide for others is false philanthropy. It is fundamentally selfishness unleashed and it will thwart future prosperity."

The Right to Medical Care
by Sheldon Richman
"All of this is a rather roundabout way of identifying the worst aspect of the “right to medical care”: the tethering of the citizen to the state. For all the criticism that is leveled at Medicare and proposals to reform medical care in general, too little attention has gone to that uncomfortable fact. If government controls medical spending, it controls you, including the very length of your life."

WPC on health care
A collection of policy briefs and press releases devoted to pointing out the folly of government socialization of health care, subsidization, and other market distortions.

Mandatory Immunization

Philosophy of Immunization
by Mark Moyers, D.C.
"Ninety-eight percent of all persons immunized under compulsory immunization laws never object! They don't know how! They don't know that they can! They don't know that they might want to, or why!"

National Health Insurance

Medical Technology and the State
May 2002
by Gary M. Pecquet
"Countries with nationalized health care, such as Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom, spend much less on medical care than the United States (only 7–10 percent of GDP compared to 14 percent in the United States).7 This is not because the government is more cost-effective than health-care markets, but because there is little innovation under a nationalized system. By restricting technological advances and cutting the quality of medical care to the bone, socialized medicine can offer lunchbox medical care to everyone, but even then routine office visits and surgeries often require waiting in long lines."

National Health Insurance: A Medical Disaster
by Jarret B. Wollstein
"Throughout the world the story is the same: socialized medicine results in skyrocketing demand for nominally “free” health care, doctors are overburdened, medical services steadily deteriorate, and there are endless waiting lists for health care. In the Soviet Union before the collapse of Communism, anesthetics, painkillers, and most drugs were rationed; 57 percent of hospitals had no hot running water; and it was standard practice to clean needles with steel wool and reuse them."

What Hunger Insurance Could Teach Us About Health Insurance
by Joseph Bast
"Our fictitious world with hunger insurance reveals how over-reliance on health insurance is at the very root of our nation’s health-care problems."

Psychiatric Prisons

The Case Against Psychiatric Coercion
by Thomas S. Szasz
"Although government-sanctioned force is used less openly today in the West to advance political and religious agendas, it is still commonly used in the name of “mental health.” The checkered history of the involuntary confinement of noncriminal “patients” reveals that this practice rests on pseudo-scientific assumptions and has undermined legal rights and individual responsibility."

Government Restrictions on Health Care

Proposed cure for world’s health: Worse than the disease
November 22, 2004
by Philip Stevens
"Meanwhile, if governments really care about improving the health of the poor they should remove the barriers they put in the way of economic development and access to medicines."

Censorship of Health Information

The Health Risks of Censorship: FDA’s Advertising Regulations Cost Lives!
November 7, 1995
by Paul H. Rubin
"Regulations of truthful advertising may violate the First Amendment. But firms are unwilling to challenge it in court because the FDA wields enormous power over them. It regulates drug manufacturing and decides what drugs may be sold. Pharmaceutical companies fear that speaking out against the FDA would invite regulatory revenge."

Power-Hungry FDA Is Hazardous to Our Health
August 10, 1995
by Robert Higgs
"The FDA forbids the dissemination of information by sellers of nutritional supplements about many of the potential health benefits of vitamins and minerals. The probable harm of this censorship is immense -- comparable perhaps to the harm caused by the FDA during the decades, ending only in the early 1970s, when it prevented sellers from touting the benefits of foods low in fats and cholesterol."

Home Birth

The Home-Birth Controversy
by Hannah Lapp
"Modern America has much to say about rights and opportunities for women, even down to the right to terminate a pregnancy. However, when it comes to nurturing and bringing their offspring safely to birth, American women often find their options severely restricted."

Licensing Health-Care Workers

The British Medical Monopoly: How It Was Created, The Harm It Causes and What To Do About It
by David Gladstone

Does Physician Licensing Serve a Useful Purpose?
July 10, 2000
by Shirley V. Svorny
"Improvements in the incentives for others to monitor physicians due to shifts in liability, the growth in group practice, and peer review, and the increased ease with which this monitoring can be performed make state licensing efforts redundant to market processes."

Harming Our Health
by Mary J. Ruwart
"Licensing of health care services gives us the illusion that we are protected against selfish others who would defraud us. Instead, our aggression boomerangs back to us, costing us our wealth, our health, and our very lives."

How and How Not To De-Monopolise Medicine
by Brian Micklethwait

The Physician Shortage: Where To From Here?
by Nadeem Esmail
"The optimal solution to Canada's physician shortage is to remove restrictions on training, practice, and pricing, and to introduce user charges."

Malaria

Our Own Silent Spring
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
"It is estimated that 800,000 children in Africa die from the disease every year, and as many as three million people altogether every year.
We know how people contract it: from mosquitoes. We know how to control it: kill the carrier mosquitoes. And we know what kills them: DDT.
So why has the war on malaria failed? Because governments banned the cure. Now they claim to wonder why people are sick and dying."

What the World Needs Now Is DDT
by Tina Rosenberg
"The move away from DDT in the 60's and 70's led to a resurgence of malaria in various countries -- Sri Lanka, Madagascar, Swaziland, South Africa and Belize, to cite a few; those countries that then returned to DDT saw their epidemics controlled. In Mexico in the 1980's, malaria cases rose and fell with the quantity of DDT sprayed. Donald Roberts, a professor at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md., has argued that when Latin America stopped using DDT in the 1980's, malaria immediately rose, leading to more than a million extra cases a year. The one country that continued to beat malaria was Ecuador, the one country that kept using DDT."

Medical Devices

Medical Device Regulations Unneeded
December 21, 1994
by Robert Higgs
"Medical device firms, whose products range from bandages and tongue depressors to CAT scanners and artificial organs, compose one of America’s most innovative and internationally competitive industries. Unfortunately, Congress has subjected the firms to increasingly onerous regulation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), causing harm to the industry and the public health."

Medical Marijuana

Medical Marijuana: The Real Stakes
December 16, 2004
by Jeff Jacoby
"Ashcroft v. Raich, the Supreme Court's medical marijuana case, isn't really about medical marijuana. It's about power -- the power of Congress to exert control, and the power of the Constitution to rein Congress in."

Organ Transplants

The AMA’s Opposition to Organ Markets: Time for a Change
May 16, 2002
by David L. Kaserman
"We can only hope that those who have not read the relevant studies will listen to those who have and that reason will, at last, prevail over uninformed emotion. Too many patients have died in the name of an atavistic policy whose sole "virtue" is that it denies payment to the families of potential organ donors."

The Economics of Organ Donations
June 5, 2006
by Richard Epstein and Russ Roberts
"The kidney people treat the list as though it's a sacred artifact, and, therefore, think that any effort of designation is an effort to subvert the list and to circumvent some natural priority—one that they have created."

A Free Market in Kidneys?
by Walter Block
"There is no doubt that those presently responsible for preventing a free market in kidneys act with the noblest of motives. To them, legalizing the purchase and sale of human organs would be degrading. Far better, from their viewpoint, that people donate their bodily parts for free so that thousands of kidney disease sufferers might live normal lives. However, no matter how benevolent the intentions of the prohibitionists, it cannot be denied that the effect of their actions has been to render it less likely that those in need will be served."

A Free Market in Kidneys: Efficient and Equitable
by William Barnett II, Michael Saliba, and Deborah Walker
"The National Organ Transplant Act of 1984 prohibits the purchase and sale of kidneys in the United States even though thousands of Americans die or suffer each year because of the ban. A free market in kidneys, along with third-party payers, would encourage kidney donations and give rise to market competition that would increase the quality of transplants and the transplant process."

A Free Market in Kidneys Would Be Efficient and Equitable: A Case of Too Much Romance
by Michael Brooks
"Barnett, Saliba and Walker have argued that a market for kidneys can be made efficient and equitable if government acts as a third-party payer-of-last-resort. But because their analysis rests on an overly romantic view of government, their conclusion—that the medical shortage would be eliminated and everyone who could benefit from a kidney transplant would be able to get one—does not hold."

A Free Market for Human Organs
by Megan Clay and Walter Block

Life-Saving Incentives: Consequences, costs and solutions to the organ shortage
April 5, 2004
by Alexander Tabarrok
"In this age of expensive medical care, many people wonder whether financial compensation for organ donation would be too expensive. In fact, we can save money while saving lives."

We Favor a Freer Market in Kidneys
by William Barnett II, Michael Saliba, and Deborah Walker
"Contra Brooks, the Barnett-Saliba-Walker analysis was not intended to justify the government’s acting as a payer-of-last-resort. A totally free market in kidneys—one without government subsides and without the prohibition of sale and purchase of kidneys, but also without other currently imposed supply-restricting interventions—would meet Brooks’s efficiency concerns and would be more equitable than the current system."

Pharmaceuticals

The Day the FDA Took a Cancer Cure Away
by Bill Sardi
"The FDA recalled a valid cure for cancer because it was mislabeled, not because it was ineffective. The FDA enforced a product recall that doomed men to their certain early demise."

Economists Against the FDA
September 1, 2000
by Daniel B. Klein
"Economists from Adam Smith to Milton Friedman have had the unenviable task of pointing out that popular, well-intentioned cures are often worse than the disease. Economists seem nasty when they report that the FDA is bad medicine. People don’t like to hear that they have bought into quackery. In collective decision-making, quackery often prevails over sense."

The FDA Needs a Big Dose of Economics
October 25, 2002
by Alexander Tabarrok and Daniel B. Klein
"In trying to eliminate bad drugs, the FDA prevents or delays many good drugs from reaching Americans. Sam Peltzman was one of the first economists to do the grisly math. His work shows that lives saved by FDA restrictions are few compared with the lives that would be saved by drugs that would be available if the FDA weren’t blocking the way."

Increasing Access to Pharmaceuticals
by Doug Bandow
"Paternalism remains a powerful influence in Washington. But it is time for patients and doctors, insurers and hospitals, pharmaceutical firms and device manufacturers, senior citizens and healthy young people to together say 'No more.'”

Locking Up Life-Saving Drugs
by Kerry Howley

Protecting Ourselves to Death
by Mary J. Ruwart
"By using aggression to avoid medications that harm us, we lose access to life-saving drugs."

(to the LNF Home Page)

Back to the list of topics
This page was last updated on January 1, 2008.